Invasion of Privacy'
Coronation Street actor Michael Le Vell is suing Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) over alleged phone hacking, seeking damages for the distress it caused. The trial is reaching its end, with a ruling anticipated soon.
Le Vell's Distressing Experience
Le Vell described the legal process as one of the most distressing periods of his life, claiming it took a toll on his well-being and brought him back to a dark place. Despite the emotional turmoil, he believed it was crucial to stand up for himself.
Concerns about Media's Invasion of Privacy
Le Vell expressed disgust at the publication of articles that revealed his inner struggles and portrayed him as a broken man during his arrest in 2011, which resulted in his subsequent acquittal. He felt violated by the intrusion into his personal life and resented the world being aware of his vulnerable state.
Paranoia and Alienation
Following the arrest, Le Vell became extremely paranoid about media stories concerning him and began to suspect those around him. He admitted to alienating decent people in his life and acknowledged the wasted years that resulted from his actions.
The Impact of Unlawful Methods
Le Vell expressed confusion and distress about the unlawful methods allegedly employed by MGN to obtain information about him. He struggled to comprehend how details were leaked, doubting his colleagues, friends, and family. The situation left him feeling vulnerable and shattered his trust in those around him.
Support from Fellow Actor Alan Halsall
Fellow Coronation Street actor Alan Halsall testified in support of Le Vell's claim, stating that the suspicion and lack of trust directed at Le Vell were heartbreaking. Halsall's witness statement emphasized the emotional toll the case had taken on Le Vell and the unjust suspicion he had faced.
MGN's Denial and Weakness of the Case
MGN denies Le Vell's allegations, stating no proof of phone hacking or illegal information gathering. Their legal rep argues weak case, citing articles published outside phone hacking timeframe.
Missing Evidence
In the trial, Judge Fancourt expressed concerns over the lack of evidence from key individuals, such as Piers Morgan and associates of the Duke of Sussex, whose testimony could have been valuable. Their insights could have brought clarity to the case.